ಇದು ಅನುಕ್ಷಣದ ಮಾತು. ಇದು ನನ್ನ ಮಾತು, ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮಾತು. ಹಾಗೆಂದು ಬರೀ ಮಾತಾಗದೇ ಅಕ್ಷರಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಅರಳಿದ ಮಾಲೆ. ಇದು ಪ್ರತಿ ಗುರುವಾರದ ಅಂಕಣ.

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ಇದು ಸುದ್ದಿ ಮಾಡುವ ಪತ್ರಕರ್ತರು, ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ, ಪತ್ರಿಕಾಲಯ ಹಾಗೂ ಇಡೀ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮರಂಗದ ಸೂಕ್ಷ್ಮ ಮತ್ತು ಕುತೂಹಲ ಸಂಗತಿಗಳೆಲ್ಲ ಕತೆಯಾಗಿ ಅರಳುವ ಬಗೆ... ಈ ಕತೆ ಪ್ರತಿ ಶನಿವಾರ.

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ಜೀವ, ಜೀವನ ಎಲ್ಲಿ ಇರುವುದೋ ಅಲ್ಲೆಲ್ಲ ಸಂತಸ, ವಿಷಾದ, ನೋವು, ನಲಿವು ಸಹಜ. ಯಾವ ಸಂಗತಿ, ಯಾರ ಜೀವನವೂ ನೀರಸ ಅಲ್ಲ. ಅಂಥ ಜನಜೀವನ, ಜನಗಳ ಮನ ಹೇಗಿದ್ದೀತು? ಇದು ಪ್ರತಿ ಭಾನುವಾರದ ಸರತಿ.

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ಎಲ್ಲವುಗಳಿಗೂ ಒಂದು ನಿಯಮವಿದೆ ತಾನೆ? ನಮ್ಮ ಜೀವನಕ್ಕೂ ಅಂಥ ನಿಯಮವಿದ್ದರೆ ಹೇಗೆ? ಬದುಕಿಗೆ ಸುಂದರ ನಿಯಮಗಳ ತೋರಣ ಕಟ್ಟಿ ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ಚೆಂದಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಾದರೆ ಎಷ್ಟು ಸೊಗಸು ಅಲ್ಲವಾ? ಇದು ಪ್ರತಿ ದಿನದ ಅಂಕಣ

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ಕೆಲವರು ಹಲ್ಲುಜ್ಜಿದರೆ ಕ್ಲೀನಾಗೋದು ಬ್ರಶ್! ನಾವು ನೋಡುವ ಪ್ರತಿ ಪ್ರಸಂಗದಲ್ಲೂ ಹಾಸ್ಯ, ವಾರೆನೋಟ ಬೀರಿದರೆ ಹುಟ್ಟುವ ಮಿಂಚೇ ವಕ್ರತುಂಡೋಕ್ತಿ.

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ಕೆಲವರಿಗೆ ಗುಲಾಬಿ ಅಂದ್ರೆ ಮುಳ್ಳು, ಇನ್ನು ಕೆಲವರಿಗೆ ಹೂವು. ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದರಲ್ಲೂ ಸಕಾರಾತ್ಮಕ ಭಾವ ಕಾಣುವುದೇ ಉದ್ದೇಶವಾದರೆ ಬದುಕಿನ ಗತಿಯೇ ಬದಲಾವಣೆಯಾದೀತು. ಒಂದು ಪುಟ್ಟ ವಾಕ್ಯ ನಮ್ಮಲ್ಲಿ ಉಂಟುಮಾಡುವ ಸೆಳೆತವೇ ಇದು! ಇದಕ್ಕೆ ಅಂತಾರೆ ಸ್ಪೂರ್ತಿ ಸೆಲೆ.

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ಓದುವಾಗ, ಸುಮ್ಮನಿದ್ದಾಗ ನಮ್ಮ ಮನದಲ್ಲಿ ಹಲವು ಕುತೂಹಲ ಹುಟ್ಟಿಸುವ ಯೋಚನೆಗಳು ಹಾದು ಹೋಗುವುದುಂಟು. ಅವುಗಳಿಗೆಲ್ಲ ತಡೆಗೋಡೆ ನಿರ್ಮಿಸಿದರೆ ಹೇಗೆ? ಅಂಥ ಯೋಚನೆಗಳು ಸುಳಿದಾಗಲೆಲ್ಲ ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಹಾಜರ್!

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

ನೀವು ಏನ್ ಬೇಕಾದ್ರೂ ಕೇಳಬಹುದು. ಆದರೆ ನಾವು ಏನ್ ಬೇಕಾದ್ರು ಹೇಳೊಲ್ಲ, ಬದಲು ಹೇಳಬೇಕಾದುದನ್ನೇ ಹೇಳುತ್ತೇವೆ. ಕೇಳುವವರು ಸರಿಯಾಗಿ ಕೇಳಬೇಕಷ್ಟೇ.

ಮುಂದೆ ಓದಿ...

TV needs informed debate

By M N Buch28th July 2012

One sometimes watches television programmes on various channels in which the anchor or moderator invites people to discuss a particular issue. Amongst the well-known anchors in India are Barkha Dutt, Arnab Goswami, Rajdeep Sardesai, Rajat Sharma, Karan Thapar and Vikram Chandra. Of these perhaps the most polished is Vikram Chandra. All our TV channels, which are largely Delhi-based, seem to have come to the conclusion that all the intelligence, all the knowledge and all the expertise on every subject under the sun resides in Delhi and that, too, in a few people, certainly not more than about 30 or 40. There is some inkling of rudimentary human intelligence in a few people in Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalore and that outside these cities we have a vast sea of people who are ignorant, devoid of intelligence and incapable of thinking or reacting to any issue that concerns us as citizens and India as a country. Therefore, all TV channels invite only the same few people to their programmes, where questions asked are predictable and the answers that each participant will give are also predictable. It is a comfortable club of cronies and they all behave in a given pattern that would have delighted the likes of Sigmund Freud.

When the programmes relate to the Army, especially such delightfully controversial people as General V K Singh, the reaction of at least some of the distinguished panellists would have delighted Friedrich Nietzsche, whose philosophy is said to have guided Adolph Hitler and the Nazis. In politics it is Manish Tiwari and Digvijay Singh (at one time Abhishek Manu Singhvi was the Congress spokesperson), Nirmala Sethuraman from the BJP, D Raja from CPI, etc, with Vinod Mehta being a constant factor as a commentator. On administrative matters and foreign affairs T S R Subramanian, Mani Shankar Aiyer and G Parthasarathy are often to be seen. Some anchors try and draw out the panellists. Some, in particular Aranab Goswami, love to bully and browbeat the panellists. One common factor in all programmes is the equivalent of the specially invited village idiot, a person who is not very articulate, who can be trusted to tie himself knots and who is the fall guy, to use an Americanism, who becomes the butt of the anchor’s ridicule.

Personally I prefer watching BBC programmes, one of which is Hard Talk. This is a one-to-one programme in which the BBC representative talks on some world issue to an eminent person from anywhere in the world. The programme is well-researched and both questioner and participant are a delight to hear. There are many panel discussions, not necessarily confined to BBC headquarters. Recently, the BBC had arranged a discussion in Australia on a proposed Bill which would legalise same sex marriages. The programme was well-researched and competently moderated and the protagonists and antagonists had been chosen with great care for their knowledge of the subject, their articulation and reasoned views. The arguments on both sides were presented brilliantly, the time schedule was adhered to, there was no cross talk and each speaker was given an equal opportunity to give his or her views. Audience intervention was to the point and the moderator ensured that the discussions did not go off the track. I have not come across a single television discussion which comes anywhere near those of the BBC. In the programme to which I refer the participants were Australians and not British intellectuals. Karan Thapar also has a programme based on BBC’s Hard Talk, but he is so aggressive, he comes across as being so cynical that the participant is never really at ease and the entire programme appears to be forced and artificial.

To revert to panel discussions, I saw Digvijay Singh being grilled by Barkha Dutt who, to give her credit, acted as the executioner whose smile never faded whilst her sword descended with finesse on the neck of a hapless Digvijay. The question she had asked was whether the Congress was not worried by the hammering it received in the June by-elections, especially in Andhra Pradesh. Digvijay said that there was no cause for concern because after all Mamata’s Trinamool Congress and Jagan Mohan Reddy’s YSR Congress were both ultimately Congress. Smilingly Barkha delivered the coup de grace by asking whether Digvijay acknowledges that these two parties were his Congress. Digvijay’s discomfiture was obvious and because I am fond of him I decided to speak to him over telephone and ask him why he participated in such a programme.

Watching the antics of our TV anchors one stark reality hit me almost like a thunderbolt. Suddenly every anchor appeared to be a madaari, a petty magician or organ grinder who tries to find ways of amusing his audience so that he can make a little money. The madaari prepares a stage on which the participants, who really are like performing monkeys and dancing bears, go through their paces to the beat of the ‘dug-dugi’ or little drum which the madaari plays, to whose beat the performers dance. All this for the entertainment of a TV audience that neither the madaari nor the performing beast sees but to please which they willingly go through the whole drama.

Does the TV have a serious purpose in life or is it only a means of entertainment? Looking at the BBC and the vast range of subjects it covers, the intelligent audience it addresses, the quality participants it invites, one feels that TV has a serious purpose in life. Listen in on a BBC programme called Date Line London broadcast every Saturday between 20:00 and 20:30 hours. Foreign correspondents posted in London come together to discuss issues of public life, British and international. It is a fascinating programme and exposes the audience to well-informed views from different perspectives. Can our channels not do something similar, initiate intelligent debate, invite meaningful audience participation and leave the viewers better informed and in a mood for introspection? Can they not identify talented people who live outside Delhi and invite them to these programmes so that the Delhi-centric focus of our TV channels expands into an all India context? Can we stop having the madaaris dominating our TV channels and performing monkeys and dancing bears taking over the stage?

3 Comments

  1. All those people Rajdeep,Sagarika,Karan Thapar, Arnab and so on..Seems to be Begging bowl of Congress.After reading this article my mind went to 7 years back i.e.Interestingly in Karnataka when a so called Legend Vishveshwar Bhatt took a charge to VIJAYA KARNATAKA we the people specially RIGHT WING got a WING TO FIRE LEFT. So we are thanks to you for giving chance for well known scholar to talk and express about the things which is right and which is wrong(SLB,R.Ganesh,Arun Shurie etc..) Once again thanks to you sir for Supplying oxygen to RIGHT WING people for easy Breath.2005/06 to till date (Kannada prabha) and every day you are creating Revolution in the field of Journalism so Congrats and keep it up sir.

  2. ಶ್ರೀ ವಿಶ್ವೇಶ್ವರ ಭಟ್ಟರೆ,
    ನೀವು ಕನ್ನಡ ಪ್ರಭ ದಲ್ಲಿ ಸಾಕಷ್ಟು ಬದಲಾವಣೆಗಳನ್ನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಪುರೋಗಾಮಿ ಬುದ್ಧಿಯಿಂದಾಗಿ ಮಾಡಿ ಬುದ್ಧಿವಂತರನ್ನೂ, ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯರನ್ನೂ ಆಕರ್ಷಿಸಿರುತ್ತೀರ. ನಿಮ್ಮ ಉಪಸಂಪಾದಕ ವರ್ಗಕ್ಕೂ ಅವರವರ ಪ್ರತಿಭೆಯನ್ನು ಹೊರ ತರುವುದಕ್ಕೂ ಕಾರಣರಾಗಿರುವಿರಿ. ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮಧ್ಯ ಪುಟದ ಸ್ವಂತ ಬರಹಗಳಂತೂ ಓದುವ ಚಪಲವಿರುವ ಉತ್ಸಾಹಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಅತ್ಯಂತ ಮೆಚ್ಚಿಗೆಯಾಗುವ, ವಿಶ್ವಕ್ಕೇ ಕನ್ನಡಿ ಹಿಡಿಯುವ ವ್ವೈವಿಧ್ಯತೆಯ ಉಪನ್ಯ್ಯಾಸಗಳ ಸರಮಾಲೆಯಂತಿವೆ. ಈ ಪ್ರಬಂಧಗಳ ಸರಮಾಲೆಯನ್ನು ಪುಸ್ತಕ ರೂಪದಲ್ಲಿ ನೀವು ಪ್ರಕಟಿಸಿದರೆ ಒಂದು ಉತ್ತಮ ಕೊಡುಗೆಯಾಗುತ್ತದೆ.
    ಆದರೆ, ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮಂಗಳವಾರದ ’ಭವಿಷ್ಯ’ ಅಂಕಣವನ್ನು ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ವಿವೇಚಿಸಿ ನೋಡಿ. ಅಲ್ಲಿ ’ಜ್ಯೋತಿಷ್ಯ’ದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ವಿಚಾರ ಪೂರಿತದ ಇಲ್ಲವೆ ಸಂಶೋಧನಾತ್ಮಕ ಲೇಖನಗಳು ಬರುತಿಲ್ಲ. ಒಂದು ಪೂರ್ಣ ಪುಟ ವೇದಾಂತ/ದೇವರುಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ, ಎರಡನೆ ಪುಟ ತಂತ್ರಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಜಾಹಿರಾತು ಮತ್ತು ತೀರ ನೀರಸವಾದ ಜ್ಯೋತಿಷ್ಯದ ಸುದ್ಧಿಯಷ್ಟೇ ಪ್ರಕಟವಾಗುತಿವೆ.
    ನಿಮ ಗೆ ಈ ವಿದ್ಯೆಯ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಆಸಕ್ತಿ ಇದೆಯೊ, ಇಲ್ಲವೋ,ಮುಖ್ಯ ಸಂಪಾದಕರಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ, ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸಿ ನೋಡಿ, ಕುತೂಹಲಕಾರಕ, ಸಂಶೋಧನಾತ್ಮಕ ಬರಹಗಳು ಪ್ರಕಟಿಸುವುದರಿಂದ ಈ ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರಕ್ಕೂ,ಬರಹಗಳಿಗೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಬೆಲೆಯಿರುತ್ತದೆ..
    –ಹನುಮಂತ ರಾವ್ ಮೊ: ೮೦೯೫೬೫೮೩೩೪.

    • Sir,
      Do I get a reply from you in case this request as above from me is read by you?

ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ ಬರೆಯಿರಿ

ನಿಮ್ಮ ಸಂದೇಶ:

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.